body image · fat · Guest Post

On boudoir photos and plastic guitars (Guest post)

Body acceptance is a theme that has run through some of Sam’s posts and certainly I have strived to love the body I’ve got as I know I make better decisions for me when I feel good about myself. I recognize my privilege in even having body image issues. That it’s a big deal for me means I have enough money, food, shelter and love to have time to gaze at my navel. I want to tell you about a journey that lead me to having boudoir photos taken and it starts with a plastic guitar.

When I was a kid I just loved being the center of attention. I tap danced, sang, acted out and generally thought I was simply amazing. Grandad encouraged me, setting out plywood  impromptu stages while he worked at whatever project was on his “to do” list. They are some of my best memories of him. So it was no surprise when in 1977 he got me a plastic guitar to augment my performance repertoire.

nat77

I love this picture for a bunch of reasons but most importantly it is one of the few pictures I have of Grandad. He hated having his picture taken, preferring to be behind the lens, documenting the moment, rather than being the image subject. Somewhere between 1977 and adulthood I stopped liking having my picture taken too. Recently I flipped though some photos my mom gave me and I noticed a few things. First, there were photos of me doing lots of active things.

nat81

Check out that Sears special bike. I loved that thing. I biked and biked and biked. I loved running and swimming and just moving. The first picture where I made the “I hate getting my picture taken” face was in 1984. Puberty struck and I hated how I looked. My teeth were big and goofy so I stopped opening my mouth when I smiled. I thought my widening hips meant I was fat. I think now that as my body became more adult shaped I hated exercise too. Moving meant attention and I no longer liked that. I still played music and sang but swimsuits meant exposing jiggley bits, my thighs touched, or worse chaffed, when I biked. So for me body image informed my activity and fitness. I no longer saw myself as an active person or worthy of having my picture taken. I feel bad for this kid:

nat1984

Fast forward to 2012 and there were few photos of me. I thought I was too fat to have my picture taken then a friend share this article:

So you’re feeling too fat to be photographed . . .

And I realized that if I died my family would have no pictures of us as a family, of me, nothing. I would be virtually erased, invisible. I thought of how few photos of I have of Grandad, (one is at a funeral for crying out loud) so I booked family photos with Ruthless Images here in London, Ontario. I had her even take some profile type pictures for me, one of which is my blog profile pic. It’s a great photo of me and really does capture my personality.  I was very nervous but the results were so lovely and I cherish all the pictures from the fall of 2012. I made a promise to get professional photos done at least once a year.

It’s 2013 and fall was well underway when Ruthless Images announced an upcoming boudoir session. My year was up so I decided, what the heck. I wanted pictures of me, what I looked like and nothing says what you look like without any clothes on. I was excited and terrified, so much so that I seriously thought of turning my car around as I drove up to the studio. Of course I picked Ruth of Ruthless Images because I love her work, her queer feminist politics and her personality, which I told Sam was “gruff and caring”. Yes, I convinced Sam to do this mad thing too!

As I was getting my make-up put on Sam pulled into the driveway and I thought “what am I doing? She’s going to see this?” and also “yay! Sam’s here!” because she is very awesome and I love getting a chance to speak face to face with her.

The session started with some jeans and a bra poses. At one point I was leaning forward in my new $120 bra and it creaked, like an old fishing schooner at sea, and I completely cracked up. Ruth was sure to show me good shots as we went through the session. After seeing this one:

bednat

I exclaimed “I’m a total babe! oh, I look so good I want to date me, I should take me home and have some fun!” and we all laughed. I was surprised by how much fun I was having but I was not prepared for my reaction to seeing the edited pictures. When I left the studio I decided then and there that even if I hated the pictures it had been a worthwhile experience. Chatting with Sam, Ruth and Melanie (the make-up artist) was a great way to spend my morning. Amazingly enough I had a teaser photo that night and WOW. It was the one above and I was agog and proud. That was me and I liked the picture. Sure, the angle and focus were flattering, the makeup perfectly applied but that was ME. How I looked, and I looked GREAT.

My body does all kinds of great things for me like get me to work and hug my kids. I bike, swim, run and do yoga. None of it consistently but all of it happens thanks to my body. These are not “before” pictures, they are not “after” pictures, they just are and they are amazing. I was sure to post a review on Ruthless Images facebook page about the impact these photos is having on me.

“I feel so awesome about myself and I’ve been showing them to everyone. They are worth every penny, actually these photos are priceless, as they have helped me see the beauty in myself that everyone always tells me about but I never saw until now. If you think you want to book a session, do it! you won’t regret it.”

And really all I have left to say is …

chairnat

Natalie is an attention seeking feminist who loves to sing, laugh, eat and spend time with friends & family. She has resolved to having lots of great pictures taken and to stop making the “I hate having my picture taken” face in 2014. Oh and to do the Kincardine triathlon…and maybe Lakeside but she has commitment issues.

cycling

Liar, liar, bike shorts on fire

So when you first think about cyclists and lying the thing that comes to mind is doping and for me the person who comes to mind is Lance Armstrong. See my post on doping, lying, and Lance. Indeed should you Google image search “cyclists and lying” it’s practically a Lance photo gallery.

But cyclists don’t just lie about doping. We also lie about the length of the ride ahead, how we’re feeling, and maybe even about how much our bike weighs.

There was was a great post making the rounds last week on the lies cyclists tell. Hilarious. See What cyclists say and what they mean.

“I’m on my beater bike”

I had this baby custom-made in Tuscany using Carbon Fiber blessed by the Pope. I took it to a wind tunnel and it disappeared. It weighs less than a fart and costs more than a divorce.

The most interesting category, I think, of cyclist lies are when you claim be training less you really are, to weigh more than you really do, or say you’re in worse shape you really are. I’m told it’s called “sandbagging.” Thanks Facebook friends! See All cyclists are liars:

“Usually spoken by an opponent just before a big race.

As in any social setting, small talk is rife. A common question to ask another cyclist at the start line or simply when you have nothing to talk about is – ” So… doing much training? ”

Almost always, the answer will be about 40% less than what they’re actually doing. They’ll complain about the kids and excess work at the office but the truth is – they’re out doing hill repeats four times a week, sprint efforts and sneaky 5 hour rides on Saturday mornings.

If you’re trying to beat your best mate in that next big race, how are you gonna do that if you’re both training together all week.

You need to get in what we call sneaky km’s.

Get out two hours earlier than him and knock out a snappy 50km. Then meet up at your usual time and when he arrives – yawn and stretch like you’ve just rolled out of bed.

When he asks why you’re sweating, explain that you only just had a shower or you’re nervous about him ripping your legs off. Play on his ego. We men lap that stuff up.

This is a legitimate tactic for achieving success and one that I’ve used regularly. Feel free to use it.”

I know the common definition of bike ninja is someone dressed in black, riding without lights, but I’ve also heard the term used to describe the person sneaking out for extra training.

Lying is a tough subject. Lots of the examples of cyclists “lies” in the posts cited above aren’t lies at all really. The new cyclist who says she’ll ride a bike but never wear lycra isn’t lying. She’s just wrong. Certainly, she’s not intending to deceive and many people think that’s necessary for a statement to count as a lie. Mere falsehoods aren’t lies. Often they’re just mistakes.

More than a decade ago I did an episode of a CBC show Ideas with a couple of other philosophers on lying. It was called “The Truth About Lying” (with Michael Blake and Arthur Ripstein) IDEAS CBC Radio 1, May 27, 2002. And lying and the ethics of lying have been on my mind a lot lately what with the Rob (I didn’t lie, you just asked the wrong questions) Ford scandal. I taught the ethics of lying this semester and between the Canadian Senate debacle and Ford, my students had plenty of examples.

My department also had a visit this semester from the brilliant philosopher Jennifer Saul, author of Lying, Misleading, and What is Said: An Exploration in Philosophy of Language and in Ethics. It’s reviewed here by my friend and colleague (now philosophy blogger too) Rob Stainton and Western PhD student Melissa MacAulay.

Maybe someday I’ll write a paper about cyclists and lies….add it to the list!

 

Uncategorized

Bootcamp in Banff

sigshot_winter_sSam and I are in Banff for the week working on our book project (exciting!). One of the fun things about this week is that we get to try some fitness classes together. That’s rare for us.  We don’t usually work out together.  And we don’t usually do fitness classes of the Zumba, Bootcamp, Spin kind. For me, the last time I did anything like that was in November 2012 when I was here at the Banff Centre for a couple of weeks. And I blogged about it.

Tonight it was Bootcamp.  The instructor was a tall, strong and lean young woman from Down Under who asked us where we were from. She didn’t ask if we were new to fitness classes or anything like that, which means either that we looked like we belonged in the room or that no one new would ever take something named “Bootcamp.”

Aside from an easy swim yesterday, I’ve been taking it easy because I’ve been attempting to recover from a stomach bug that hit me hard the day we left (worst travel day ever). So for me, it wasn’t going to take much to make it “puke-worthy.”

About 20 people showed up for the class.  We each took a mat, a set of “medium” weights and a set of “heavy” weights. I took 6 lbs and 15 lbs respectively.  Nothing heavier than 15 lbs was available, which was fine, because even though 15 lbs is very light for deadlifts, the whole thing challenged me.

These things always start off easy-ish with the warm-up. Once warmed up, the class went like this. We repeated circuits of three exercises: push-ups, deadlifts, and weighted crunches (or something involving raised legs that I didn’t choose or pay much attention to).  We did each for 40 seconds, with 40 seconds of an increasingly difficult cardio blast in between.  The first circuit we did jump squats. The second circuit we did reptile burpees.  The third time around, it was flying jumping jacks. Fourth round: Plank jack burpees (I think). Fifth round: scissor lunges.  Sixth round: bicycle oblique crunches.

I was ready to loose my afternoon snack after the second round. I will blame the bug. I lay down on my mat to catch my breath (a strategy we are invited to employ in hot yoga, and to which I thought I better help myself). The instructor came to check on me and I said I was just getting over some sort of stomach thing.  She looked alarmed and said, “at altitude!” which I guess was a reference to the fact that when you live near sea level, the thinner air in the mountains (we’re at 1400 metres here) can challenge the system.

I am proud to say that I only sat out for one 40 second cardio session in the entire class despite how I was feeling (don’t try this at home).  I’d like to that think on a different day I would not have chosen the easiest modified option for each of the cardio sessions after that.

As I said to Sam afterwards, I liked a few things about the class:

1.  A good instructor–she taught a demanding class and showed concern when I was struggling.  She checked in with me periodically after that. My ego might have struggled against that a bit but it was good of her to make sure I was okay.

2. The moves were not too complicated. The last time I did a class here the moves were so confusing I couldn’t figure them out. Tonight was more about endurance than about complexity. I prefer that.

3. The class was intense enough that everyone focused on their own workout.  I didn’t feel like anyone had time to look around or pass judgment on anyone else. I think even the people who weren’t about to barf didn’t spend a lot of time thinking beyond their own mat, their own weights, their own plank jack burpees or what have you.

4. That same focus meant that, for me anyway, I didn’t have any time to think about other things. I love physical activities that don’t let my mind wander.

5. I usually like heavier weights, but with the intensity and continuous movement of this class, the lighter weights and timed reps were good.

6. No mirrors. I’m getting more and more opposed to mirrors when I’m working out. Why in the heck do I need to look at myself?

And as a bonus, fitness classes come free with our artist cards.

I confess that I was a bit hard on myself sometimes, thinking I should be doing better.  Even in my regular condition, I’d have some work to do before I’d be able to stick with the unmodified versions of everything for the entire workout.

As a way of getting in some cardio and strength training with weights and with bodyweight exercises, Bootcamp does its job.  It’s offers an excellent break from writing and, better yet, we didn’t need to go outside to get over the building with the gym (I forgot to mention that today was -28 degrees C with the windchill–almost 20 degrees C warmer than it was on the weekend, when this was the coldest place on the planet). I’d do it again.

 

 

 

 

Uncategorized

Nelson Mandela: “Sport has the power to change the world”

MandelaNelson Mandela, iconic representative of hope and peace, believed in the power of the sport to “change the world, to inspire, to unite people, to create hope where there was once despair.”

And when Nelson says something, it motivates people to believe it.

In 1998 I had the honor of attending a specially-convened convocation in Harvard Yard to award Mandela, then President of South Africa, an honorary degree. It was only the third special convocation in the history of Harvard, the others being for George Washington and for Winston Churchill.

I was on my first sabbatical, and spent part of the year at the Bunting Institute at Radcliffe College. The Institute’s director had two of the highly-prized tickets (these with assigned seating close to the front!) to this momentous occasion. Because of my South African roots, she offered one of them to me. The other went to another Bunting Fellow who had been involved in the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

This is all by way of saying that Nelson Mandela was an extraordinary man and a compelling speaker.  Here is the text of his Harvard speech, in which he so humbly accepts his honorary degree, saying:

I know that through this award you are not recognizing any individual achievement, but are rather paying tribute to the struggles and achievements of the South African people as a whole. I humbly accept the award in that spirit, while at the same time wishing you to know that we are not unaware of the great compliment you pay us by conferring this degree at a specially convened convocation.

It was the only time in my life that I have actually felt proud of my South African heritage. And when Mandela spoke, it really did feel (to me and each of the other 25,000 people in the Yard, no doubt) as if we were just sitting in his living room while he told stories over a cup of tea and a plate of rusks and biscuits.

But back to sport.  Though the music makes this Youtube video a bit over the top, it captures an inspiring message about the power of sport, delivered by a great human being.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lvHnYQsTBU

Kind of makes you want to go out and play, doesn’t it?

And for those who are curious, the Harvard speech (which starts of with some wonderful stories and good humor):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Zh8otC-c3s

Uncategorized

Traveling, new gyms, and thin privilege

I know going into new gyms is stressful for everyone who travels for work and who works out on the road. I’m shy to begin with and having to deal with people who think I’ve never exercised before and that I’m new to fitness centres is hard. Mostly I cheerfully take on the role of being the ambassador for fat, fit people everywhere. (Even though I’m still ambivalent about the label “fat”–see Fat or big: What’s in a name?— I know that’s what most people see.)

Let me explain what I consciously do to make it easier. (And I know that not everyone can do these things. Call what I’ve got “fit privilege.”)

First, I wear the right clothes. That’s easy.

Second, I often deliberately chose water bottles  from past races I’ve done. Fitness instructors notice and it helps smooth my path.

These days I always wear my CrossFit hoodie. Nothing screams “yes, I’m qualified to do your fitness class” quite like a CrossFit hoodie.

I get what fitness instructors are concerned about. They don’t want a visitor, a guest member, on a 1 day pass, keeling over dead in their class. They don’t know me, and they want to qualify me as capable of surviving their class without extra attention. It’s the professional and caring thing to do.

But I wonder about thin privilege and whether smaller, fit people feel the need to prove themselves to new gyms in this way.

I also worry that this might hurt thin people too. My worry is that fitness instructors might assume you’re fit and not give you the help you need. See How equating being fat with being out of shape hurts thin people too. Is this worry right? Let me know. (What’s thin privilege? Have a look at Let’s Talk About Thin Privilege.)

Today I went to a spin class at the Banff Centre for the Arts and the instructor handled meeting a new person well. She asked if I was familiar with spin bikes and how to adjust them and I said “yes.” I said I wished I’d brought my bike shorts and shoes. She smiled. We talked about cycling and winter. I mentioned the Forest City Velodrome and she asked about fixed gear bikes and how fast did you need to go to stay up on the walls of the track. All good. I’m welcome back any time and no heart attacks were had.

It was a fun class though I have two beefs about spin classes: The seats! Why not nice skinny road bike seats. (I know why. They scare people, but really they are more comfortable.) And all that bouncing to the music. Keep your upper body still people! Save your dancing for the night club. But of course, if they don’t ever ride real bikes all that bouncing is just fine.

 

 

cycling · running · training

Go hard! : Why train with a heart rate monitor, part 2

In my last post on heart rate training, aimed at people new to the idea, Take it easy: Why train with a heart rate monitor, part 1, I said that often we think we’re running easy when we’re not. Going easy is tough. It’s humbling to realize how slow you need to go to have the run count as easy for you when you first start out. But it can also be tough at the other end of the spectrum. Often we’re shocked to find we’re not working as hard as we thought either. When you first start running, or riding, there’s one natural speed you go at and it’s a challenge to get out of that zone in either direction.

Fern Oliner had been a runner for more than 25 years when she experienced a breakthrough in her performance. It happened at age 59, during a challenging half-marathon. “For the very first time, I felt like a true runner,” she recalls. “There I was on the uphill, passing people and feeling totally in control. I absolutely loved it.” Her secret? Oliner was wearing a heart-rate monitor. “I was breathing heavily as I was going up the hills, but the monitor told me I was okay. So I sped up,” she says. “If it weren’t for the monitor, I would’ve kept running at the slower pace, as I’d always done.” How To Use A Heart Rate Monitor

When do I use a heart rate monitor when going hard? Like Fern I’ve found it helpful on hills. I’ve reviewed heart rate data on climbs I thought were killing me only to discover, after the fact, that I was nowhere close to maxing out. I just hate hills.

I don’t look at my heart rate monitor while bike racing but I do review it after.

In my post about racing and about how racing forces you to go hard, I said:

I get that but to be fit you have to push yourself and trust me, you’ll never ever push yourself as hard in training as you do when racing. I wear a heart rate monitor when training on the bike and I’ve done VO2 max testing so I’ve got some idea of what the various sports training zones mean for me. I’ve also worn the heart rate monitor when criterium racing. The first time I did this and then looked at the data after I laughed out loud at how much time I’d spent in the red zone, E4. That’s something I just can’t make myself do for very long outside race situations. I won’t bore you with all the geeky gory details but here’s the my HR data from a crit last year: Avg HR 171, max HR 178 (32% in E4) Avg speed 33.2, max speed 42. No way I could do that outside a race.

The one exception to not looking at the heart rate monitor while racing are time trials.  What’s the difference?

During road races and criterium races you do everything you need to to stay with the pack. You’re not going to slow down because your heart rate monitor tells you to. There’s lots of spikes, lots of time in the red zone, but knowing about it won’t help. And even if you did want to look there isn’t time and you need to pay attention to what’s going on around you.

But in time trials–like the bike bit of a triathlon–you’re riding alone. You set the pace. Ideally you know the magic number at which the cost of going fast is too high, you won’t recover well, and you aim to keep your heart rate just under that number. That means learning to pedal downhill and keep up the pace and not blow up by going too fast. In time trials the heart rate monitor is your best friend. It can keep you focused on working hard enough, but not too hard.

In my post about my identity as a data and gadget geek  I talked about my experiences having VO2 max testing done. I’d post the video but it’s truly not very exciting. Me on a bike wearing a special mask! I have thought about having it done again to have new benchmarks.

Four years ago I even had lactate threshold testing done along with V02 max testing so I could accurately chart my heart rate training zones. It was all done on my bike and I even have gripping video footage to prove it.

The results: V02 max starting 13.2, lactate threshold 35.5, peak 39.7; heart rate starting 120, lactate threshold 162, peak 177; calories per hour starting 329, max 983; METS starting 3.8, max 11.3; Recovery: max 177, 1 min 158 (34%), 2 min 124 (93%); Fitness level: superior.

I liked that, fitness level: superior. Not elite. But that’s fine. I have a day job.

But you needn’t go all fancy and have individual lab testing done to get good use out of a heart rate monitor. While the 220 minus your age formula is way too simple, you can calculate your own max heart rate using data from a race such as a 5 km time trial. There’s some good info on training zones (for running) and calculating your max heart rate here: Heart Rate Training: Is It Right for You?

Here’s the bike version from Heart rate monitor training for cyclists:

Many believe that you can calculate your maximum HR by using the formula of 220 minus your age. For some people this may be accurate, but for many it will be wildly out. I’m 54 years old so, using the formula, my max HR should be 166 (220-54). It’s actually 178, which is a big difference when training in very tight zones.

A much more accurate formula is 210 minus half your age, then subtract 5% of your body weight in pounds. Add four for a male and 0 for a female. The only way to get a truly accurate max HR figure is to get a physiological test at a sport science centre, such as Fletcher Sport Science, but you can get a reasonable estimate by doing your own max HR test. Only undertake this test if you are fit and exercise regularly, though.

Warm up thoroughly for at least 15 minutes. On a long, steady hill start off fairly briskly and increase your effort every minute. Do this seated for at least five minutes until you can’t go any faster. At this point get out of the saddle and sprint as hard as you can for 15 seconds. Stop and get off the bike and immediately check your HR reading. This is your max HR.

“Don’t forget that your max HR figure is sport specific,” says Fletcher. “This means that your maximum on a bike will invariably be much lower than it is when you’re running because the bike is taking some of your weight.”

And here’s the Chris Carmichael version from Bicycling:

The Carmichael Training Systems Field Test
My field test consists of two eight-minute time-trial efforts separated by 10 minutes of easy spinning for recovery. If you’re riding outside, try to complete both efforts on the same course and from the same starting point. Spend the first 30 to 45 seconds getting up to speed, then settle into the highest intensity you can maintain for the full eight minutes. Do your best to keep your cadence at or above 90 rpm. For each effort, record average heart rate and/or power, distance covered, and average cadence. Then, use the higher of the two average heart rates to calculate your ideal training intensities, as indicated by the chart below.

NOTE: Your field-test heart rate is not the same as your lab-measured lactate threshold heart rate, so the calculations based on this heart rate are specific to this field test.

INTERVALPHYSIOLOGICAL BENEFITINTENSITY RANGE
(% OF FIELD TEST HR)
COACH’S TIPS
 Endurance
Miles
 Base aerobic
fitness
 50–91%The 91% is a ceiling to account for variables like hills. Aim to stay at 60 to 75% during the majority of your ride.
 Tempo Aerobic power 88–90Intervals should be long (20 to 25 minutes), with as little interruption as possible.
 Steady
State
 Power at lactate
threshold
 92–94Intervals should be 10 to 20 minutes each, with recoveries half as long as the intervals.
 Climbing
Repeat
 Sustainable
climbing power
 95–97Targets the same energy system as Steady State; the intensity is higher because of the extra muscle  involved in climbing.
 Power
Interval
 Power at VO2
max
 101 or moreHeart rate will lag behind your effort during these short (one to three minutes max) efforts. Go as hard as you can and use HR data for evaluation afterward.

What’s a tough workout at high heart rate?

You might try the T-Max Intervals:  Perform 2:30-minute intervals at 95 to 100 percent of max heart rate (the point at which you cannot speak), followed by recovery to 60 percent of max, or until you can speak in full sentences. Do two to six sets twice a week, with at least two days of spinning or rest between.

There’s lots of debate about how often to do interval training and how long the intervals should be but the biggest thing that makes a difference in performance results is intensity. You can read some of the discussion here.

Good luck! And you might want to reread the posts on throwing up and suffering before heading out.

Uncategorized

Do You Need an App to Tell You When to Eat and Drink?

fuel myrunOn the theme of fancy gizmos that tell you when you should (or in the case of the “smart bra” shouldn’t) eat or drink, there’s an app called “Fuel My Run.”

Again, the very idea of needing to be told when to eat and drink runs counter to the whole Intuitive Eating mindset. Are we really so disconnected from what our body needs that we can’t tell when to eat or drink?

When we are in the middle of a long run, bike ride, or some other endurance activity, the answer turns out to be “yes.”  This article about How to Eat and Drink During a Marathon says:

Developing and executing a strategy for ingesting fluids and energy during the marathon is a crucial step towards success on race day. You can’t expect to just wing it and drink and eat when feel like it if you want to run your best. Developing a race fueling strategy takes practice and intelligent planning.

Start drinking fluids early. Don’t wait until you are thirsty or you’re getting hot or dehydrated. If you wait until you’re thirsty, dehydration or glycogen depletion may already be starting. Furthermore, as I discussed in my article on preparing your body for the marathon, the more distressed your body becomes, the more difficult it is for your digestive system to process all the fluids and energy you take in. By taking in fluids early in the race – when you’re not yet fatigued or stressed – you give your digestive system optimal conditions to get the electrolytes and sugars distributed to the muscles that need them.

If that’s true, then a running app that doesn’t just track, but also alerts us about when to eat or drink, could be useful in optimizing our running performance.

Question: Does this go against the principles of Intuitive Eating that say we should eat when we’re hungry, stop when we’re satisfied?

I don’t think so. We’re not constantly engaged in endurance sports.  It makes sense that when we subject the body to conditions that are not the norm for it, different strategies might be required.

Someone who is regularly committed to listening to their body and responding to its signals for food or drink is dealing with it appropriately under typical conditions.

But endurance sports tax the body differently, and waiting to feel thirsty or hungry is like waiting until your car sputters to a halt at the side of the road before re-fueling.  Not the best strategy for maintaining a consistent pace and staying strong.

Personally, I never get hungry when I’m out running (not that I’m ever out long enough for it to matter much).

I encountered “the wall” on that windy bike ride back in early November and needed to be told by one of the other riders that I should be drinking something to replace electrolytes and eating something to give me more fuel for the rest of the trip.  I didn’t realize that I needed to eat or even drink that day because I was dealing with so many other adverse conditions that the only thing on my mind was keeping the wheels on my bike turning.

It makes sense, then, that people who usually eat and drink in response to their body’s cues might need some prompting on longer runs or rides or even swims.

So in that sense, the app strikes me as useful and consistent with a more general commitment to intuitive eating.  If someone marketed an app for every day use that always told us when to eat and drink, that would be a different story.

I’m imagining now an app for dieters that only allowed us to eat or drink at certain times, and forbade us from taking anything in outside of those times.  That kind of app trains people to deny themselves and ignore their body’s natural signals not for any performance reasons, but simply as a dieting/weight loss tool.

“Fuel My Run” is not like that. Instead of forbidding us to do what we would like to do, it reminds us to do what we need to do to stay adequately fueled for the activities we’re engaged in.  Given that the body doesn’t always send signals fast enough, reminders during activity aren’t a bad idea.

eating

Is Your Bra a Smarter Judge of When to Eat than You?

smartbrabgI’m a big advocate of Intuitive Eating, so at first glance, a bra that is designed to tell me to step away from the fridge sounds like a bad idea.  But though it won’t be on the market any time soon, according to this report “a team of researchers at Microsoft have been working on a prototype of a smart bra embedded with sensors that track the wearer’s heart activity, so that it can monitor her emotional moods and essentially intervene when she’s stressed out and tempted to overeat.”

My favorite philosophy blog, Feminist Philosophers called this “the panopticon bra.”  The panopticon is that prison design that leads the inmates to self-police because they never know when they are being watched.  Feminists frequently claim that social norms around femininity have a panopticon-like hold on women’s lives. I myself have likened food tracking to the panopticon.

The Consumerist says of the bra:

Once those sensors detect a looming episode of overeating, they signal the woman’s smartphone which will then flash a warning telling her to back away from the fridge and make better diet decisions. Which, again, not sure it’s cool for a bra to be telling people how to live their lives, but then again, if people want that help, sure, give it.

Being a proponent of Intuitive Eating, I know that one of the most challenging aspects of it is learning to decipher the difference between emotional eating or habitual and mindless eating, on the one hand, and eating because we’re hungry, on the other hand.

The main goal of Intuitive Eating is to learn to eat when you’re hungry and stop when you’re satisfied. Period. And that’s a huge challenge for many people. Hence, the bra.  The Consumerist is right to point out that men also struggle with mindless and emotional/stress-related eating.  So a non-bra alternative would also have a market.

Sam asked me if I thought the bra advocated something like the opposite of Intuitive Eating because it does the monitoring for us and tells us when to pay attention.  I think it could be a useful device for the aspiring Intuitive Eater because it encourages us to pause.  I don’t see it as necessarily shaming or guilting us into not eating.  Rather, I see it as potentially useful for helping us be more mindful.

I know, I know. Tracking is supposed to be the same — it encourages mindfulness.  So in this sense, whether using the bra or using tracking, are we not engaged in panopticon-like self-policing?  I guess to that I would say it depends whether you are using it as a “stick” or merely as a method of creating more awareness.

For me, tracking feels more stick-like than neutral.  I can do it for short periods of time to gather information, but used over the longer term it feels like a life sentence of sorts.  Similarly I can imagine that if the bra is used as an awareness tool on the path to becoming a more Intuitive Eater, then the eventual goal would be to dispense with it. It doesn’t need to have a panopticon-like hold on us.

In the end, for most of us, emotional eating is not a successful way to cope with stress. Becoming aware of it and learning to deal with stress in other ways is a worthwhile long term goal that goes hand in hand with learning to approach food more intuitively, to meet the body’s needs.

The smart bra won’t always be smarter than the person who wears it.

fat · fitness

Dueling headlines make my head hurt

In the same day I got both of these headlines more than once in my Facebook newsfeed:

1. New Study Lends More Weight To ‘Fat But Fit’ Theory – http://huff.to/1bRFmZ1

Researchers at Middle Tennessee State University, led by exercise scientist Vaughn Barry, Ph.D., examined 10 past studies that recorded information about participants’ body mass indexes and fitness levels. The studies looked at the weight and fitness levels of thousands of participants (the largest one included 21,856 people) and continued to follow up with the participants over several years, ranging from an average of 7.7 years to an average of 16 years.

Barry’s team crunched the numbers on those past studies by dividing participants into three weight categories based on BMI: normal weight, overweight and obese. Then they put them into two categories based on their performance on an endurance test (in most studies, this involved running on a treadmill): fit and unfit.

They found that fitness levels, not weight, predicted whether or not a participant had died in the study’s intervening years. Unfit people, regardless of their weight, had twice the risk of dying during the study than fit people, and overweight and obese people who were fit had similar mortality risks as fit, normal weight participants. Another way of putting it: thin, unfit people had twice the mortality risk as obese fit people.

The study was recently published in the journal Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases

2. ‘Healthy and overweight’ is a myth, study suggests http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/health-25118857

Excess fat still carries health risks even when cholesterol, blood pressure and sugar levels are normal, according to a study of more than 60,000 people.

It has been argued that being overweight does not necessarily imply health risks if individuals remain healthy in other ways.

The research, published in Annals of Internal Medicine, contradicts this idea.

The study looked at findings from more than 1,000 published studies.

Researchers from the Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, found there was no healthy pattern of increased weight when heart health was monitored for more than 10 years.

They argue that people who are metabolically healthy but overweight probably have underlying risk factors that worsen over time.

Study leader Dr Ravi Retnakaran told BBC News: “This really casts doubt on the existence of healthy obesity.

“This data is suggesting that both patients who are obese who are metabolically unhealthy and patients who are obese who are metabolically healthy are both at increased risk of death from cardiovascular disease, such that benign obesity may indeed be a myth.”

From a certain perspective the stories could both be right and not contradict one another. It might be that fat and fit people have health risks but are still better off than the unfit and thin. It might be that weight matters but that fitness matters more.

But having both these stories in my newsfeed on the same day being offered up by friends on different sides of the great weight debates made my head hurt.

Excuse me while I go watch some comfort TV, Once Upon a Time, and cheer on the Evil Regals. Yes, I know it’s not the best TV out there but I watch with resident teenagers and it’s got some kick ass women as both villains and heroes. Love the women in that show, even Snow for all that she annoys me.

Aikido

Aikido, The Samurai Spirit

I just came across this great documentary on Aikido. It’s produced by NHK, Japan’s public broadcaster. The series featured different martial arts and this episode is all about Aikido. I think it’s pretty good. I’m often trying to explain Aikido, how it works and what makes it different from other martial arts, and this does a pretty good job.

Samurai Spirit was a TV documentary on NHK World from 2008 to 2009, focusing on the traditional martial arts of Japan. It was hosted by Nicholas Pettas, a Kyokushin Karate practioner and former K-1 Grand Prix champion. Each episode focused on a particular martial art (and any sub style within that art), where Nicholas would travel around Japan, meet some of the high ranking masters in the art and participate in classes to learn some of the techniques. He would then sit down with the masters to learn about the philosophy and unique aspects of the art. Finally, each episode would end with Nicholas reflecting back on what he has learned from this experience and its relation to the samurai spirit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rs4gTZjSqJc&feature=youtube_gdata_player

If you’re at Western, the campus Aikido club meets three times a week–Wednesday and Friday evening, and Sunday morning–and it’s just $25 a semester in addition to campus rec dues. Come play with us and learn to throw professors around!

If you’re in London, come play with us at the Aki Budo Centre, just south of Adelaide and Oxford. Beginners welcome Tuesdays at 7 and Saturdays at 10. Stop by and watch and give it a try!

And if you’re in the wide world beyond Western and beyond London, there are Aikido clubs all over the world. It’s a beautiful martial art.