athletes · racing · triathalon

Are Women-Only Races Sexist? No. Are They Good for Women? Yes.

bigstock-Water-Start-1455231In July, Sam and I are taking part in the Kincardine Women’s Triathlon.  It’s a women’s only event that happens annually.  The founder, Janet Bannerman, established the race to raise money for the local community and

 “to give the women the opportunity to have a race where they could feel empowered. They could compete against other women and feel comfortable.”

We might react more negatively to races for men only, wondering why they were excluding women. We might even go so far as to say that they are sexist because they discriminate against women.  Why should we regard women-only races any differently? To answer this question, we need to think about the reason for them.

The idea of spaces for women only has been around for a long time.  Author Virginia Wolff talked about the need for women to have “a room of their own.” She reasoned that the women of her day had been discouraged from pursuing an education, let alone having careers as writers, because only boys were expected to produce art or seek employment that might require an education.

In the sixties and seventies feminists sought refuge from the demands of patriarchy by setting up women-only spaces.  Rape Crisis Centres and Women’s Shelters often conceive of themselves as providing women-only spaces where women can feel safe from the threat of violence from male partners and family members.

Girls-only schools and women-only colleges and universities are premised on the often contested yet enduring idea that girls and boys, women and men have different learning styles and that girls and women are more likely to thrive when they are not sharing their learning space with men. Why are they more likely to thrive? Numerous reasons get cited, from same-sex schools having fewer “distractions” once the kids enter adolescence (if they’re straight kids, that is, which most of the research assumes) to girls-only or women-only environments providing them with more opportunities to participate and to lead.

They also assume that boys and men are more competitive, or at least that girls and women compete differently, less aggressively, than boys and men.  Whether or not that’s true, it’s widely assumed.

There is a great deal of evidence in the research on implicit bias that in co-ed environments, boys and men are taken more seriously in classrooms, tend to dominate discussion, get called on more frequently by their instructors.  This sends the subtle message that they have more of a right to be there. In a girls-only or women-only context, this tendency to pay more attention to the men cannot occur.

The reasoning for women-only and girls-only spaces flows from the assumption that they have been structurally and systemically disdvantaged by a society that implicitly privileges men. [this is not to say that male privilege is the only sort of privilege operating in our world — we might also note the existence of white privilege, class privilege, non-disabled privilege — for now I’d like to focus on gender].  Creating opportunities for women as a systemically disadvantaged group is not the same as doing the same for men, who already enjoy social privilege and entitlement in all sorts of public arenas, including sports.

Does the idea that women might thrive more easily in scenarios where men are taken out of the equation translate over into the women’s only racing events?  The founder of the Kincardine Triathlon says it gives women a race in which they can feel empowered and feel comfortable.  Other women’s only triathlons promote the idea of “racing with your friends” and “celebrating women’s sport with the beginner in mind.” It’s less about competition and more about solidarity.

Sam has written about women-only cycling events, such as the Cupcake Ride and Heels on Wheels. One of her reservations about these events was the way they associate women on bikes with femininity rather than focusing on athleticism.  She acknowledges that if that’s what gets women out on bikes, then so be it, but laments the downplaying of cycling as a physically demanding sport.

The women’s triathlons that position themselves as fun events where women can feel empowered and comfortable don’t include pink cupcakes and high heels. In this respect, they focus on the triathlon as sport. Nevertheless, they down play the competitive aspect.

The “Race for Life” (a run to fundraise for cancer research) in the UK has a page on its website that addresses the issue of “women-only” for its event:

“We regularly review our events to make them the best they can be. Two years ago, we seriously investigated the possibility of including men in Race for Life. However, our research shows that a significant number of our Race for Life supporters would strongly prefer to keep it a female-only event as it is a unique opportunity for women to come together in a non-competitive environment within an atmosphere of ‘sisterhood’.”

Why is an event with only women attractive to women? This question has more than one answer.

I confess that in my own case, the idea of a triathlon is pretty intimidating. If I had to compete in the same race as men and women, I might feel just that much more intimidated. Why? It’s more of an attitude than anything else, hard to generalize about without seeming to stereotype. I’m more comfortable doing poorly in the company of women only. I don’t mind as much if I mess up, if I completely blow the cycling part of the race (which I fear is just what will happen), or if I take too long to make the transition from the swim to the bike ride.

I feel as if my women friends are more likely to say “great job!” regardless of my actual performance.  I know at least a few men who would be more inclined to say, in a well-meaning yet still demoralizing way, “you could have done better than that!”

As an aside, women aren’t always supportive and can also say the wrong thing in a way that hurts.  When I told a woman friend of mine who used to be quite competitive in 5K races what my time was in my first 5K, she laughed, or rather scoffed.  I immediately jumped in an felt the need to defend myself: “I wasn’t really competing. I just wanted to try it, with the goal of finishing the race.”

But generally speaking, a woman-only environment feels more like a “safe space” for taking risks. As I noted earlier, there’s a long tradition of women-only or girls-only spaces. We’ve spoken a lot on the blog about the statistics about sport. Women in general tend to be less represented in sports from crossfit to triathlons.  Certain areas of the gym, such as the weight room, tend to attract fewer women.  As philosophers, Sam and I like to press these facts and ask “why?”

One answer to the question of “why?” has to do with the kinds of expectations we have for girls and boys that lead us to socialize them a certain way. I wrote a whole post about why deeper social meaning of the color pink can be harmful to women. Ideals of femininity include soft, nurturing, supportive, non-competitive, and, more perniciously, weak and uncoordinated (as we see in the fact that “throwing like a girl” is an insult).

These assumptions about femininity have an impact on social expectations of girls and women and, in turn, on what we expect of ourselves.  So some of us enter these arenas (e.g. the gym, the track, the velodrome, the triathlon) with caution.  They tend to be dominated by men and we don’t always feel welcome.  We’ve blogged about this here.

Women-only events are a great middle ground between acknowledging that women are also entitled to engage in these activities, on the one hand, and that for many women these are new pursuits that might feel intimidating, on the other hand.  Participating with women only helps to take the edge off just a little.  And since few of us have fully escaped our socialization into at least some feminine qualities, these sorts of events do tend to be supportive and empowering. That makes them more fun and less stressful.

At the same time, I’m wary of spending too much time celebrating the idea that women don’t like competition or that we compete differently (in a more friendly way? in a way that is more concerned with how our co-competitors feel? in a less aggressive way? I’m not sure that’s always been my own experience competing with other women.). I’ve blogged about why competition can be a good thing for women. We don’t have to crush our opponents or relish in their defeat, but we can enjoy winning.

Competition can be healthy and enjoyable. We expect men to engage in it, but women should engage in it too.  Races are a great opportunity to do just that.  If women-only races, such as the Kincardine triathlon that we’ve signed up for, encourage more of us to engage in these sports they play a positive role.

15 thoughts on “Are Women-Only Races Sexist? No. Are They Good for Women? Yes.

  1. It really irks me that just because you know what you want and aren’t afraid to go for it – all of a sudden ur a butch or bitch oh you have to be a Society doesn’t seem to react favorably towards powerful women and it’s a crime!!!
    In the same respect we have been complaining for years to be included in the men’s arena in sports. Reluctantly they have allowed women to play on their teams or to compete. So to turn around and have women only events. Of course the men are going to call you on it.
    Sorry men but we want it both ways, loll

  2. I like women-only races (my first half marathon was a women’s race – “Hippie chick half” – though men weren’t forbidden to enter), but I’d make a distinction between “women-focused” and “women-themed” – a lot of the ads I see for women-only races seem to be going beyond just creating a supportive atmosphere to creating a feminine atmosphere, full of pink and tutus. And as you mentioned, I think having the nurturing environment of a race full of women can be helpful, adding too much focus on stereotypical girly outfits and such can take away from that too.

  3. One argument that seems to me to be relevant is that men and women would be racing separately anyway in the sense we’d be racing in different categories. There would be a men’s winner and a women’s winner and no overall winner. I’ve done a mixed duathlon and the men out there that you’re running/biking with aren’t really your competitors so it’s a bit odd. So since they are essentially different evens I don’t see an issue wit holding them separately The more challenging question is whether in some sports, all sports?, men and women ought to compete against one another….

  4. A closely related question is where does that leave the less competitive newbie males. When I picked up a road bike about 18 months ago after 20 years of not riding there were ‘bike angels’ and a ‘gear up girl’ ride to help and support me. When my brother made the same choice he was on his own.

    1. I agree. It’s tough for beginner men in the world of road cycling. My bike club in Canberra, Australia has a novice program for new members but that’s rare. I wish bike shops would do ‘learn to ride’ the way running shops do ‘learn to run’ clinics.

  5. I play softball with a co-ed team, ranging in age from 20s to 70. I really enjoy the mix, but am also a decent enough player that I have confidence in my skills. I think anything that really encourages women to come out, compete (hard) and see what fantastic skills they can have is all for the good.

    That said, you’re right that we also need some very specific encouragement and coaching. In my mid-30s, with no prior experience, I took up sabre fencing (here in NYC where I live), and was nationally ranked for four years — thanks to a two-time Olympian coach who took a handful of us women taking night classes at NYU in fencing, and who challenged us to try it. Initially, we were dubious and nervous (women just didn’t fence saber, mid 1990s) but loved it and were good at it. I will always be grateful to him for his idea and to my fellow athletes for jumping into the fray.

  6. It’s funny that you say that an event that excludes people based on their sex isn’t sexist.

    The fact of the matter is that it is the very definition of sexist. There are loads of women’s only races and no men’s only races that I know of. This is part of the reason the women’s races mostly have lighthearted themes (cupcakes, high-heels, etc)– they are set up to encourage a specific subset of females to join– those to whom an all-girls event sounds appealing.

    I don’t believe that men are more aggressive when it comes to encouragement. My experience has been that aside from elite athletes, nearly all runners are friendly, encouraging and non-judgmental.

    There is a good reason for women’s only athletic events and it’s not because the piggish men ruin everything. The reason is twofold: For elite female athletes, there is a possibility of actually winning the event, not just being the first female finisher (even though men and women are scored separately, there’s something distinctly more authentic about actually being the first to cross the finish line, not just the first without a penis). For non-elite women, the difference becomes very pronounced. For example, in a recent race I did in NYC, 2200 men and 1800 women entered and completed the race. Out of the first 100 finishers, 5 were female and out of the first 500, 50 were female (and the female winner was 19th overall). These numbers are typical of all the races I’ve done.

    Now a man who comes in 500th place in such a race is a good runner, but a woman who does is an amazing runner. It can be pretty demoralizing to be an awesome runner, to be in 500th place, when in a women’s only race she’d be in the top 2%. I think most people (men and women) realize this an are okay with such events, but they still are exclusionary and make some people feel left out.

    The above phenomenon is extremely pronounced in professional sports: there is no such thing as professional men’s basketball: in theory a talented woman could be drafted to the NBA. Since this hasn’t and is unlikely to happen (Male basketball players are taller and heavier for one), the WNBA was started as a women’s only league. Is it sexist? Tautologically, yes. But most people don’t really care.

  7. “Are women-only races sexist?” Sorry, but YES. You cannot “argue” that it is not sexist because *reasons.* It’s sexist or it isn’t. By every definition of this word, these races meet that definition. The title of your article is a straight-up lie. Now, whether they are GOOD for women and their space is a subject of debate, and I say you lay things out nicely in your writing and make some good points about the need for these races- but you cannot redefine the word “sexist” to suit your feminist needs. Women-only runs are sexist.

  8. Also, it’s worth noting that at most of these races, men are allowed to race. It is just frowned upon if they act like dicks. Which is the way it should be. Nothing is stopping people from suing due to sexist practices. I say, run the race with women, if you’re not going to be a twat. I’m running a Women’s 5k with my lady next week, and we’ll linger in the back and have a good time. Nothing wrong with that. Welcome to equality.

  9. Reblogged this on FIT IS A FEMINIST ISSUE and commented:

    For today’s #tbt I searched back to April 2013, five years ago, to see what we were writing about. It’s extremely interesting to me to observe the evolution of the blog over the past five years and especially how my thoughts on some things have changed. But one thing that hasn’t changed is my support of women-only spaces, including events. There is still a place for them and I’m glad we have them. For more, read on….
    Have a good one!

Comments are closed.