What about speed? What about altitude?: Two problems with step counting

I blogged recently about counting steps while at conferences in Europe. Short story? Good, because Europe. Bad, because conferences.

But still I got over 10, 000 steps in everyday and while in Scotland hit some new highs.

screenshot_2016-06-15-16-17-14.png

That’s a lot of walking.

But there’s at least two ways that this number doesn’t tell the whole story.

The first is altitude. I reached 25,000 steps the day Sarah and I walked up to Arthur’s Seat in Holyrood Park.  What’s Arthur’s Seat?

Holyrood Park is a short walk from Edinburgh’s Royal Mile in the heart of the city. It is a 640 acre Royal Park adjacent to Holyrood Palace.

About Sam B

Philosopher, feminist, parent, and cyclist!

2 thoughts on “What about speed? What about altitude?: Two problems with step counting

  1. kimberlyvo says:

    One of the things I like about the fitbit is that it tracks stairs (altitude, really) and “active minutes.” As I’ve been recovering form some health issues, the activity minutes has been a great way to make sure that I’m getting some actual movement in (it requires a little amount of speed for at least 10 minutes. A 20-minute mile seems to be fast enough).

    Liked by 1 person

  2. UpwardSpiral says:

    Yeah, on a fitbit, if you ascend 10ft, it counts as one floor. Actually, it picks up this ascent even when you’re not on foot. Even being in a car that’s climbing a hill reflects in your ‘floor’ count.

    Like

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s