Bad/good news for non-responders…

Some people seem to work out and work out but don’t get any fitter. And that’s true for both aerobic exercise and weight training. I suggested earlier that such people might make a rational choice not to exercise.

After all, they’re doing the work but not seeing the usual benefits. In that post, Rational couch potatoes unite I looked at a number of studies of non-responders, all of which noted a wide variation in response to exercise. There isn’t a one size fits all approach to “couch to 5 km.” It might take some people weeks and others months. Ditto for speed.

And I talked about the variability and the need for personalized exercise programs in Personalized exercise, recovery, and the unfit.

A new study though casts doubt on the existence of non-responders and suggests that they are only non-responders at low doses of exercise. The cure for non-responders might not be a more gentle approach to exercise. The best cure might be working harder, more intensely, and for longer periods of time. They’re not non-responders. Instead, they just need a higher dose.

That’s either good news or bad news depending!

See Non-responders just need to try harder in the Globe and Mail. It describes a study conducted by Dr. Robert Ross and his colleagues in the School of Kinesiology and Health Studies at Queen’s University. They compared the results of three different 24-week exercise programs on 121 sedentary, obese adults.

The researchers measured aerobic fitness every four weeks, and saw the number of non-responders in all three groups decline as the study progressed. In the low-amount, low-intensity group, however, the non-response level plateaued after eight weeks, with more than one-third of the subjects still failing to see any improvements after 24 weeks.

That suggests the minimum exercise level prescribed by health guidelines isn’t sufficient for everyone: “It’s just not enough to move the needle on a number of people,” Ross says. “I mean, [a non-response rate of] 30 per cent is not a trivial number.”

Doubling the amount of low-intensity exercise reduced the non-response rate to 17.6 per cent, but the most impressive results were recorded in the high-intensity group, in which the number of non-responders was reduced to zero by the end of 24 weeks.

So maybe non-responders are people for whom the right amount of exercise is a lot and the right intensity level is high.

Sorry, non-responders.


One thought on “Bad/good news for non-responders…

  1. like you said, good and bad news. Good because I can feel like my hard work won’t be for nothing; bad news because I might need to add an extra workout or two to my weekly schedule to really see results…


What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.