Tracy recently complained about Photoshop that it sets unrealistic beauty standards for women. Tough enough to look like a super model but now the images are so perfect that not even super models look like the super models on the web and in magazines.
And I get it. I really do.
But I’m also a philosopher. And philosophers love to play devil’s advocate, defending unlikely positions and views. Someone’s got to defend wildly indefensible things like Photoshop. I’m also a bit of an optimist, tending to see the silver lining in every cloud.
So here I’m going to say a few things in favour of Photoshop. It might not be the case that all things considered, Photoshop is a good thing. I’m sure, in fact, that it’s not. But it’s not all bad either. That’s my only claim, it’s not all bad. So this is a pretty minimalist defence of Photoshop.
This is also minimalist in another sense. It’s not a fully grown up blog post. It’s more like a comment on Tracy’s post that got out of hand.
Oh, and to be clear, it’s a defence of Photoshop done well. I’ve got nothing good to say about the model with the missing butt cheek that Tracy was talking about.
Here are some things in favour of Photoshop:
First, when my son was taking a modelling course and hanging out with some models, I was surprised to hear them defend Photoshop but actually it made sense. “Yeah, I’ve gained a few pounds and lost my thigh gap but I’m not worried they’ll just fix it with Photoshop.” Huh. Photoshop means less pressure on actual teenage models to be perfect because flaws can be fixed. To a one, the aspiring models were fans.
Second, among the would be models at least there was no thought or expectation that these pictures matched reality. Of course, it’s all Photoshop. No pressure to look like that. No one does. Not even them. Maybe word could spread and we’d stop thinking of these images as attainable for anyone. They’d be more like computer art.
Third, and finally, and this is a wish and dream, if we’re going to be creative with Photoshop can’t we be really creative. Why stop at thigh gaps? I think models with wings would look great. How about wild, multicolored tentacles? Or scaled skin or hooved feet. I think I’ve made the same point about cosmetic surgery on this blog somewhere. I’d like it better if it were more imaginative and playful, less convergence on a single ideal of beauty.
So that’s my few words of defense. Not very long or very very strong. But I had to get it out of my system!