fitness

My Dumb Smartwatch

Last week, I wrote about fitness guidelines encouraging 150 minutes of moderate to vigorous activities a week. But also noted that that we need to count all incidental movement, not just structured activity.

Counting more activities is a good thing! I say this as someone who does at least three hours a week of structured physical activity that never triggers my fitness watch to count it because it is not of sufficient intensity. Or maybe it’s because I have a dumb smart watch. I have to put all my swims, dance classes, Pilates and yoga manually because my watch doesn’t track any of those things.

Plus I often get near the 7,500 daily step goal Participaction recommends, simply by walking around the pool rather than sitting during long lifeguarding shifts, or when I walk to do errands, but none gets counted unless it is sufficiently intense AND I have turned on the “walk” tracing function.

That said, I used my bike several times for short trips lately, and suddenly my watch is showing that I met or exceeded that 150 minute exercise goal. And if I remember to turn on “walk” to measure my walks to the grocery store or whatever, that gets counted too.

A friend said she got her watch to count the movement involved in snow shovelling by setting it to “cardio”. I just tested that with a short walk at the pool and it looks like I can update to “swim” and still retain the heart rate info. I’ll test that at my next swim practice.

Sadly, using “walk” while lifeguarding doesn’t get me any intensity minutes because I don’t get much heart rate high enough – a good thing in this context. I didn’t even get a fun squiggly GPS map because I was walking indoors.

I wonder what other ways I can trick my dumb smartwatch into counting movement. Maybe jazz class?

Lily Tomlinson shows off her jazz hands

Do you have any tricks for tracking your more intense workouts? Do you even worry about having some sort of evidence or external motivation to hit those Participaction goals?

fitness

Participaction’s Latest Report Card on Physical Activity in Adults: Stagnation and Possibly Some Hope?

I happened to catch a segment on my local radio show about the latest report card and the thing that stuck out for me was the gender component of who isn’t getting enough activity, at least according to traditional measures. You can read the report itself here.

Overall, the report said there has been very little shift in who is getting enough exercise, but also that the study was moving away from traditional measures of physical activity as being primarily moderate-to-vigorous exercise (i.e., physical activity that is planned, structured, repetitive and done with the goal of improving fitness) to considering exercise that is less structured and in shorter bouts – things like active transportation or unstructured light activity such as play or social dancing.

Counting more activities is a good thing! I recently got back on my bike for short trips. Most of those rides were only for 5-10 minutes, but my smart watch said I met or exceeded the 150 minutes of moderate-vigorous exercise, even without counting all the steps I took while walking instead of sitting at work, or walking to do errands.

Those kinds of incidental exercise are what women seem to get while men are more likely to go to the gym or other structured activity.

The big challenge is how to track it. Not everyone wants to use a smart watch, or even thinks about it when going from a distant parking spot to the store, or walking to and from the bus stop, or playing with our kids in the park or walking the dog. But all those things absolutely count and we should be giving ourselves credit for that effort.

Diane in a colourful winter coat and blue bicycle helmet beside her red and white winter bicycle.

Maybe if we do, our results on the next survey will look better.

fitness

Our kids are failing at fitness: Why? (Sam has some ideas)

The news seems to be the same each year, another bad grade for Canadian children and fitness. See “Canada’s kids receive a D+ for overall physical activity levels. Find out how we can improve the grade in the 2018 ParticipACTION Report Card at https://t.co/COvvBnUYfg https://t.co/0vJYWZcs6h.”

What’s the issue? Over the years we’ve been thinking and writing about this we’ve had some ideas and suggestions. Here’s six of them:

First, we should think in terms of everyday movement, not exercise.

Second, we shouldn’t police gender and kids sports.

Third, we should stop protecting children and allow them to take risks.

Fourth, we shouldn’t assume that because kids do sports that they get enough activity in their lives.

Fifth, we should let girls do active things like ride bikes.

Six, we should think about physical activity broadly, not just running, but also playing outside.

A silhouette of children playing. Photo by Rene Bernal on Unsplash

fitness

Have you forgiven Participaction? Sam hasn’t yet…

In theory I ought to like Participaction. I’ve been going to write and say nice things about their movement based activity encouragement programs.

Their list of 18 resolutions to make in 2018 is pretty good.

Here’s some text from them about 2018:

“This is the year to take charge and make change. We love the start of a fresh new year. It’s a time when many resolve to make positive changes, like exercising more. Yes! But, despite our best intentions, we often fall short. We lose momentum, motivation dries up, and too often, we end up right back where we started. This is where ParticipACTION comes in.”

If you’re not Canadian you might not know what they are all about: “ParticipACTION is a national non-profit organization whose mission is to help Canadians sit less and move more. Originally established in 1971, ParticipACTION works with its partners, which include sport, physical activity, recreation organizations, government and corporate sponsors, to make physical activity a vital part of everyday life.”

What’s to dislike?

And yet, I feel guilty and judged each time I look at their website. That’s weird. I’m a super active Canadian. I might even be one of the 1 in 5 Canadians who meets the weekly recommended amount of physical activity. I love their focus on outdoor activity, inclusive fitness, joyful movement across generations. There’s little (maybe no?) talk about weight loss on their website. They ought to be my people. And yet…

What’s going on then?

In truth, I haven’t forgiven them yet for the Canada Fitness Test which I failed each year through elementary school and I took that failure to heart.

The Canada Fitness Award Program was a national fitness test and evaluation program operated by the Government of Canada department Health and Welfare Canada from 1970 to 1992. It ended ten years after I graduated high school and it was replaced by something much more my speed, the active living challenge.

I don’t think Aimée has forgiven them either. You can abut her experiences in her post about finally coming to think of herself as athletic.

I was the kind of kid who loved school. I thought tests were a great idea. Give me a test and I do well on it. I had test taking down pat. I loved teachers too. I even tried at one point to run away and join the nuns who taught me.

But the fitness test? I cried every year, I think. It taught me that some people were athletic and others were not. I was not.

Here’s the test:

Pushups. No time limit. Maximum continuous reps.

10m Shuttle Run

Situps No time limit. Maximum continuous reps.

Standing Long Jump

50m Run

1-mile run

Flexed-arm hang for time

It was the flexed arm hang that did me in every year!

Here’s Jess and Chantal, two people like me, who failed the test as kids recreating it.

Here’s a defence of the test including a score sheet so you can take the test and rank yourself

From 1985

Do you remember the Canada Fitness Test? How’d you do? Scarred for life or not?